Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kaizen Insider's avatar

Point 4 is the one most people misread. The argument isn't "don't use AI." It's that AI can help you produce — but it can't supply the thing that makes writing worth reading in the first place. The raw material is irreplaceable: what you've actually seen, done, and gotten wrong.

I write about Japanese manufacturing quality methods applied to knowledge work. I use AI heavily in the process. But the content that performs is always the content rooted in something I watched happen on a factory floor — not something a model could have generated from first principles.

AI is a production accelerator. It doesn't create source material. That part is still entirely yours.

Anthony Bichsel Webster's avatar

I always enjoy your posts, Kyna. It’s very nice to encounter people who continue to be passionate about one of life’s most essential skills - clear written communication. I wonder how many schools and Universities currently make the effort to teach teenagers these skills and to instill in them an understanding of why the ability to write well is so valuable. Good writing is at once all about pulling thoughts out of our heads, whilst at the same time organizing those thoughts and expressing them in a way that makes ourselves a little more understandable to others. Good writing can be informative, inspiring, persuasive and memorable in equal measure. The quality of our thinking is determined not only by our experiences and knowledge but also by our mastery (or otherwise) of language and our ability to articulate our reflections in words that engage others.

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?